Fong Choi Yu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
FONG CHOI YU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying suspension of petitioner’s deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a) (D- No abuse of discretion in denying suspension appears on the record. Proof of a petitioner’s eligibility for suspension does not compel the granting of that relief. (United States ex rel. Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy (1957) 353 U.S. 72 , 77 S.Ct. 618 , 1 L.Ed.2d 652 ; MacKay v. McAlexander (9th Cir. 1959) 268 F.2d 35, 40 .) That petitioner would suffer economic hardship from deportation is insufficient to require an exercise of the Board’s discretion in petitioner’s favor. (Llacer v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (9th Cir. 1968) 388 F.2d 681 .)
The petition to review is denied, and the order of the Board is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Dong Hyung Lee v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Jong Ha Wang and Kyung Hwa Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Cecelia Pelaez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Ioannis Georgios Asimakopoulos and Maria Asimakopoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most recent
- Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Mavis Malvina Vaughn v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Jong Ha Wang and Kyung Hwa Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Vincent Sik-Hung Chan and Pauline Poon-Kar Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- Dong Hyung Lee v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.