TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Catarino Capatillo Gutierrez

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Catarino Capatillo GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Gutierrez, 560 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 28, 1977
Docket
No. 77-5081
Judges
Brown, Ro-Ney, Hill
Citations
560 F.2d 1951977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11373

Opinion — Per Curiam

*196 PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from a jury conviction for possession of 292 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The appellant contends that the checkpoint, seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas, where he was stopped for a citizenship check, has not previously been adjudicated to be a permanent checkpoint. This Court’s jurisprudence shows otherwise.

United States v. Kalie, 5 Cir. 1976, 538 F.2d 1201, 1202 , n.l; also, United States v. Andrade, 5 Cir. 1977, 545 F.2d 1032 ;

United States v. Diaz, 5 Cir. 1976, 541 F.2d 1165 ;

United States v. Garza, 5 Cir. 1976, 539 F.2d 381 .

The appellant also contends that the odor which the officer believed to be marijuana did not provide probable cause to search the vehicle. The odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle constitutes probable cause to search.

United States v. Torres, 5 Cir. 1976, 537 F.2d 1299 ;

United States v. Andrade, supra; United States v. Diaz, supra.

He also contends that the officer’s testimony should not have been admitted because he was not qualified as an expert as to the odor of marijuana. Since the appellant did not object to the officers qualifications, and since the testimony involved does not constitute clear error, the issue is waived. Rule 51, F.R.Cr.P;

United States v. Fendley, 5 Cir. 1975, 522 F.2d 181, 185-86 ;

United States v. Maddox, 5 Cir. 1974, 492 F.2d 104 , cert. denied 419 U.S. 851 , 95 S.Ct. 92 , 42 L.Ed.2d 82 . The judgment below is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Oyarzun582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tex. 1984)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Oyarzun582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tex. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 8

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Diaz, 541 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1976) 14
United States v. Andrade, 545 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir. 1977) 8
Williams v. Court of Appeal of Cal., 419 U.S. 851 (1974) 59
United States v. Fendley, 522 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1975) 50
United States v. Maddox, 492 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1974) 24
United States v. Torres, 537 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1976) 22
United States v. Garza, 539 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1976) 11
United States v. Kalie, 538 F.2d 1201 (5th Cir. 1976) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list