Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by BREWER, C.
The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on July 6, 1910. The plaintiff 'in error has failed to file any brief in the case. Th§ petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290 , 111 Pac. 543 ;
Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778 , 117 Pac. 200 ; McC lelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287 , 119 Pac. 205 .
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.