TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bricklayers', Masons' & Plasterers' International Union of America v. Bradley

BRICKLAYERS’, MASONS’ & PLASTERERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA Et Al. v. BRADLEY

Bricklayers', Masons' & Plasterers' Int'l Union of Am. v. Bradley, 1918 OK 239, 172 P. 440
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 23, 1918
Docket
No. 9673
Judges
Miley
Citations
172 P. 4401918 OK 23968 Okla. 1491918 Okla. LEXIS 321
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
(Syllabus.) Appeal and Error — Commencement of Proceeding in Error — Dismissal. A proceeding in error in this court to reverse, vacate, or modify a judgment or final order commenced more than six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of will be dismissed.
Summary
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action between the Bricklayers’, Masons’ & Plasterers’ International Union of America and others and J. S. Bradley, administrator of the estate of W. H. Bradley, det-eéased. Judgment for the latter, and the former bring error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Miley

MILEY, J.

This proceeding in error was commenced on the 22nd day of .December, 1917, to reverse the judgment of the court below rendered on the 24th day of May, 1917, and the order overruling motion for new trial made and entered on the 11th day of June, 1917. More than six months had elapsed from the rendition of the judgment and order overruling motion for new trial when this proceeding was commenced, and the defendant in error moves to dismiss upon that ground. By chapter 18, Session Laws 1910-11, p. 35, it is provided that all proceedings for reiversing, vacating, or modifying judgments on final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. The motion is therefore sustained. Continental Beneficial Association v. *150 Gray, 67 Okla. —, 169 Pac. 1070 ; Shelton v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 79 , 162 Pac. 1092 .

All tke Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Shelton v. Wallace, 1917 OK 111, 162 P. 1092 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list