TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Laramour v. Campbell

Laramour v. Campbell, 1917 OK 478, 168 P. 216
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 9, 1917
Docket
No. 8520
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
168 P. 2161917 OK 47864 Okla. 3211917 Okla. LEXIS 658
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
(Syllabus by the Court.) Appeal and Error — Orders Appealable— “Final Order.” An order made by the district court vacating and setting aside a judgment theretofore rendered is not a final order from which an appeal lies.
Summary
Error from District Court, Seminole County; Geo. C.' Crump, Assigned Judge. Action by AVilliam Laramour against Don Campbell. Judgment for plaintiff, and from an order setting aside the judgment he brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

On August 4, 1915, plaintiff, Wm. Laramour, sued defendant, Don Campbell, in damages for failure to perform a parol contract. Defendant demurred to the petition, which demurrer was overruled, whereupon, defendant electing to plead no further and to stand upon his demurrer, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for. the amount claimed and defendant granted time within which to perfect an appeal to the Supreme Court. Thereafter, on January 20, 1916, defendant filed a motion to vacate and set aside said judgment upon certain jurisdictional grounds, to which plaintiff filed his answer. This motion was treated by the court as a petition to vacate the judgment, and, upon hearing thereof, the court set aside the judgment theretofore rendered in favor of plaintiff. It is from the order vacating and setting aside the judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff that this appeal is prosecuted.

It is urged by defendant that the. appeal should be dismissed, upon the ground that the order of the court vacating and setting aside said judgment is not a final order from which an appeal lies. This contention must be sustained. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that an order vacating and setting aside a judgment is not a final order within the contemplation of Rev. Laws 1910, secs. 5235, 5236, and that no appeal lies therefrom. Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 24 Okla. 299 , 103 Pac. 1038 ; Smith v. Whitlow et al., 31 Okla. 758 , 123 Pac. 1061 ; Berger Mfg. Co. v. School Dist. No. 10, 44 Okla. 436 , 144 Pac. 1023 .

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 11945: 119232026peak 1923 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter1923 OK 59, 233 P. 700
  2. In re Hunter's Estate1945 OK 112, 158 P.2d 345

Most recent

  1. In re Hunter's Estate1945 OK 112, 158 P.2d 345
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter1923 OK 59, 233 P. 700

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 1909 OK 204, 103 P. 1038 16
Berger Mfg. v. Sch. Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co., 1914 OK 606, 144 P. 1023 5
Smith v. Whitlow, 1912 OK 413, 123 P. 1061 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list