Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.

BERGER MFG. CO. v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 10 OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY Et Al.

Berger Mfg. v. Sch. Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co., 1914 OK 606, 144 P. 1023

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided: December 8, 1914
Docket: No. 3879
Judges: Thacker, Graffenried
Citations: 144 P. 10231914 OK 60644 Okla. 4361914 Okla. LEXIS 719
Disposition: Dismissed.

Cited by 5

Syllabus

APPEAL AND ERROR — Decisions Appealable — Order Vacating Judgment — “Final Orders.” An order vacating a judgment under .sections 4464 and 4465, St Okla. 1893 (sections 5267 and 5268, Rev. Laws 1910), is not “final,” and no appeal therefrom is authorized by sections 4434 and 4436, St. Okla. 1893 (sections 5235 and 5236, Rev. Laws 1910). (Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Summary

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Action by the Berger Manufacturing Company, a corporation, against School District No.. 10 of Muskogee County and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Thacker

Opinion by THACKER, C.

An order vacating a judgment as authorized by section 4464, St. Okla. 1893 (section 5267, Rev.

*437 Laws 1910), upon procedure prescribed by section 4465, St. Okla. 1893 (section 5268, Rev. Laws 1910), is not a final order Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 24 Okla. 299 , 103 Pac. 1038 ;

Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co. et al., 29 Okla. 390, 118 Pac. 135 ;

Smith v. Whitlow et al., 31 Okla. 758 , 123 Pac. 1061 ;

Langston v. Thigpen, 33 Okla. 605 , 127 Pac. 258 ), within the meaning of sections 4434 and 4436, St. Okla: 1893 (sections 5235 and 5236, Rev. Laws 1910) ; and upon the authority of the above-cited cases this appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →

State Highest Courts5

Relies on it most ⓘ

Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter1923 OK 59, 233 P. 700
In re Hunter's Estate1945 OK 112, 158 P.2d 345
Laramour v. Campbell1917 OK 478, 168 P. 216
Gilliam v. Kali-Inla Coal Co.1918 OK 297, 173 P. 69
Johnson v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County1927 OK 156, 256 P. 900

Most recent

In re Hunter's Estate1945 OK 112, 158 P.2d 345
Johnson v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County1927 OK 156, 256 P. 900
Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter1923 OK 59, 233 P. 700
Gilliam v. Kali-Inla Coal Co.1918 OK 297, 173 P. 69
Laramour v. Campbell1917 OK 478, 168 P. 216

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 1909 OK 204, 103 P. 1038	16
	Smith v. Whitlow, 1912 OK 413, 123 P. 1061	9
	W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co., 1911 OK 298, 118 P. 134	7
	Langston v. Thigpen, 1912 OK 638, 127 P. 258	4

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list