TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. State

Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. State Ex Rel. Jones

Bd. of Com'rs of Creek Cnty. v. State, 1915 OK 540, 150 P. 455
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 29, 1915
Docket
No. 4703
Judges
Collier
Citations
150 P. 4551915 OK 54048 Okla. 4771915 Okla. LEXIS 657
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made—Attestation—Seal. Where the certificate of the trial judge to a purported case-made is not attested by the clerk of the court and the seal of the court attached to such attestation, such purported case-made is a nullity ■and presents no question for review. 2. APPEAL AND ERROR — Transcript—Form—Seal. Where a purported case-made is attempted also to be certified as a transcript, the certificate of the certifying clerk must be substantially in the form required by rule 16 of this court (38 Okla. viii, 137 Pao. x) and have the seal of the clerk attached to such certificate; and, if the seal of said court be not so attached, such attempted transcript is a nullity and presents no question for review. (Syllabus by Collier, C.)
Summary
Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Suit for mandamus by the State, on the relation of J. J. Jones, against the Board of County Commissioners of Creek County, Oklahoma. Judgment for the relator, and the defendant brings error. ■ This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of the district court of Creek county, awarding a peremptory mandamus against the defendants in error, “commanding that, immediately upon receipt of this writ, they refund to the said J. J. Jones the sum of $170.93 and the sum of $105.42, respectively, being the respective sums set forth in plaintiff’s motion herein as having been erroneously and illegally assessed and collected from the said relator, J. J. Jones, by the county of Creek, and that the said board of county commissioners immediately issue their order upon the county treasurer of Creek county, requiring him to pay to the said J. J. Jones the said respective sums of $170.93 and $105.42 out of any undistributed funds in his hands, etc.” • The purported case-made shows that the certificate of the trial judge thereto was not attested by the clerk of said district court under the seal of said court; but it is also attempted to be certified by the clerk of said court, but not under the seal of said court, as a transcript.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Collier

*479 Opinion by COLLIER, C.

(after stating the facts as above). The certificate of the trial judge to the purported case-made filed in this case not being attested by the clerk of such trial court, with the seal of such court attached, such purported case-made is a nullity, and confers no jurisdiction upon this court to review any question presented by such purported case-made.

Stallard v. Knapp, 9 Okla. 591 , 60 Pac. 234 ;

Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632 , 75 Pac. 1131 ;

Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443 , 141 Pac. 779 .

Rule 16 of this court ( 38 Okla. viii , 137 Pac. x ) prescribes the form of a certificate to a transcript when' the appeal to this court is upon a transcript of the record of the trial court, and' prescribes that such certificate must be under the seal of said court, and, as the certificaté of said clerk to the purported case-made is not made under the seal of said court, consequently said purported case-made cannot be considered as a transcript of the record of the proceedings of the trial court in this cause.

Childers v. Fleetwood, 39 Okla. 455 , 135 Pac. 931 .

As the purported case-made is a nullity, and the same cannot be regarded as a transcript, this appeal should be dismissed.

' By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 21916: 31931: 119152026peak 1916 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Courtney v. Moore1915 OK 709, 151 P. 1178
  2. Billington v. Grayson1916 OK 687, 158 P. 433
  3. Walker v. Walker1916 OK 41, 154 P. 512
  4. Fields v. Fields1915 OK 572, 155 P. 245
  5. Missouri Pac. Railroad Co. v. Miller41 S.W.2d 971 (Ark. 1931)
  6. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann159 P. 297 (Okla. 1916)

Most recent

  1. Missouri Pac. Railroad Co. v. Miller41 S.W.2d 971 (Ark. 1931)
  2. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann159 P. 297 (Okla. 1916)
  3. Billington v. Grayson1916 OK 687, 158 P. 433
  4. Walker v. Walker1916 OK 41, 154 P. 512
  5. Courtney v. Moore1915 OK 709, 151 P. 1178
  6. Fields v. Fields1915 OK 572, 155 P. 245

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Stallard v. Knapp, 1900 OK 42, 60 P. 234 13
Oligschlager v. Grell, 1904 OK 38, 75 P. 1131 12
Montemat v. Johnson, 1914 OK 300, 141 P. 779 7
Childers v. Fleetwood, 1913 OK 582, 135 P. 931 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list