Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal
Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal (No. 2).
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Mr. Justice Schaffer, This is a companion appeal to the Solar Electric Co.’s Appeal (No. 1), supra, page 156; in it the appellant sought to raise the question of the jurisdiction of the court below by petition under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23; it did not do so however until the case had proceeded to Anal hearing. The question of jurisdiction under this act must be raised preliminarily and therefore appellant’s petition' came too late: Wilson v. Garland, 287 Pa. 291 . The course prescribed by the act must be pursued: Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 289 Pa. 94 .
It follows that this appeal must be and it accordingly is dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.