TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Remer J. Dasher v. Norman Stripling

Remer J. DASHER, Respondent, v. Norman STRIPLING, Petitioner

Dasher v. Stripling, 714 F.2d 1084 (11th Cir. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 16, 1983
Docket
No. 81-7441
Judges
Godbold, Ro-Ney, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Henderson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark
Citations
714 F.2d 10841983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16860

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The state appeals a grant of a writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court. A panel of this Court reversed in a divided decision.

Dasher v. Stripling, 685 F.2d 385 (11th Cir.1982). This Court took the case en banc, which resulted in the panel opinion being vacated. The judges of the en banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed as a matter of law, and this decision of the Court of Appeals has no precedential value.

Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906 , 99 S.Ct. 1996 , 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).

AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Henderson v. Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist., 441 U.S. 906 (1979) 151
Henderson v. Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist., 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1978) 16
Dasher v. Stripling, 685 F.2d 385 (11th Cir. 1982) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list