Mari Otto v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secy., Department of Health & Human Services, Howard Jacobson
Mari OTTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secy., Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant, Howard Jacobson, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
*338 ORDER AMENDING OPINION The opinion issued January 28, 1986 is amended as follows:
Delete the last two sentences and substitute:
Retention of jurisdiction over the pendent state claims is a matter for the district court’s discretion.
Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397, 403-05 , 90 S.Ct. 1207, 1213-14 , 25 L.Ed.2d 442 (1970). The usual rule is that state claims should be dismissed if the federal claims are dismissed before trial.
United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 , 86 S.Ct. 1130, 1139 , 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966);
Jason v. Fonda, 698 F.2d 966, 967 (9th Cir.1982);
Wren v. Sletten Construction Co., 654 F.2d 529, 536 (9th Cir.1981). The district court, of course, has the discretion to determine whether its investment of judicial energy justifies retention of jurisdiction, Rosado, 397 U.S. at 403 , 90 S.Ct. at 1213 , or if it should more properly dismiss the claims without prejudice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Schneider v. Trw, Inc.
- Schneider v. TRW, Inc.
- Brenda L. BROCK v. UNITED STATES of America
- Kent Alexander v. William Perrill and Luis Rivera
- Bator v. Hawaii
- 66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 290, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,347 Susan A. Bator v. State of Hawaii, and Carolyn M. Kainuma, in Her Individual Capacity Warren T. Asaeda, in His Individual Capacity
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.