Kay v. Frick
Louis Kay v. Childs Frick
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county modified by reducing recovery to $105.16; and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the testimony of plaintiff at folios 65-67 of the record established a locus pcenitentiai for the defendant, and barred plaintiff from recovering damages for wrongful discharge. (Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co., 143 N. Y. Supp. 411 ; affd., 163 App. Div. 939 ; Connell v. Averill, 8 id. 524.)
Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.