TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. American Ice Co.

Security Mutual Casualty Company v. American Ice Company, Inc.

Sec. Mut. Cas. Co. v. Am. Ice Co., 268 A.D. 924 (1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 20, 1944
Citations
268 A.D. 92451 N.Y.S.2d 2991944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4277

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

— Action to enforce contribution under section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act, on the theory that the predecessors in interest of plaintiff and defendant were joint tort-feasors and equally responsible for a wrong which resulted in judgments that plaintiff, as insurer, ultimately paid. Plaintiff sues under its right of subrogation. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The record of the *925 trial of the prior actions — Gernhardt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., Inc. ( 259 App. Div. 735 , affd. 284 N. Y. 765 ), and McGready v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., Inc. ( 259 App. Div. 737 , affd. 284 N. Y. 765 — which resulted in the judgments on which this action is founded, shows that while the pleadings formally charged the ice company with the same acts of negligence as the laundry company, nevertheless the proof established, without contradiction, that the ice company in no way participated in the wrongful act which caused the accident. On the contrary, the proof showed that it was the laundry company which stored and maintained the gas without-the required permit; that the gas was stored for the exclusive use of the laundry company; and that it was maintained on a part of the premises which was owned and occupied by the laundry company. The local city ordinance (now Administrative Code of the City of New York, § C19-95.0; L. 1937, eh. 929) imposes no duty upon any person other than the one who stored the gas. Under such circumstances, the laundry company is the primary, if not the sole, wrongdoer and hence, it cannot, through plaintiff, enforce contribution or indemnity from the ice company’s successor. (Cf. Employers’ Liability A. Corp. v. Post <& McCord, 286 N. Y. 254 ; Bonadonna v. City of Buffalo, 156 Mise. 225; Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 App. Div. 354 , affd. 185 N. Y. 580 ; Bunn v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Go., 175 N. Y. 214 ; Bcott v. Curtis, 195 N. Y. 424, 428 ; Schwarts v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp., 290 N. Y. 145 .) Close, P. J,. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.,concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 11972: 119602026peak 1960 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Liebman v. County of Westchester71 Misc. 2d 997 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)
  2. Oliver v. McPherson24 Misc. 2d 1072 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)

Most recent

  1. Liebman v. County of Westchester71 Misc. 2d 997 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)
  2. Oliver v. McPherson24 Misc. 2d 1072 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 9

DepthCaseCited by
Gernhardt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 31 N.E.2d 514 (N.Y. 1940) 1
Dunn v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., 67 N.E. 439 (N.Y. 1903) 128
Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Constr. Corp., 48 N.E.2d 299 (N.Y. 1943) 104
Scott v. Curtis, 88 N.E. 794 (N.Y. 1909) 92
Phœnix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 A.D. 354 (1905) 54
Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 78 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906) 34
Employers' Liab. Assurance Corp. v. Post & McCord, Inc., 36 N.E.2d 135 (N.Y. 1941) 25
Gernhardt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 259 A.D. 735 (1940) 1
McCready v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 259 A.D. 737 (1940) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list