TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse

The State, ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse, Cuyahoga Cty. Engineer

State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse, 451 N.E.2d 248 (Ohio 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 20, 1983
Docket
No. 82-981
Judges
Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Citations
451 N.E.2d 2486 Ohio St. 3d 556 Ohio B. 731983 Ohio LEXIS 777

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Appellant contests the denial of his request for an award of attorney fees.

“The general rule in Ohio is that, absent a statutory provision allowing attorney fees as costs, the prevailing party is not entitled to an award of at *56 torney fees unless the party against whom the fees are taxed was found to have acted in bad faith. See Sorin v. Bd. of Edn. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 177 [ 75 O.O.2d 224 ]; State, ex rel. Grosser, v. Boy (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 184 [ 75 O.O.2d 228 ].” State, ex rel. Crockett, v. Robinson (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 363, 369 [ 21 O.O.2d 228 ],

Appellant argues that appellees acted in bad faith by engaging in dilatory conduct designed to prolong litigation and delay the award of back pay to appellant. Specifically, appellant contends that appellees’ motion to dismiss, the granting of which was the subject of the first appeal to this court, was without merit and filed only for the purpose of delay.

We cannot agree that this demonstrates bad faith on the part of appellees. As we stated in State, ex rel. Crockett, supra, at 369-370, the fact that appellees interposed a defense which was ultimately overruled does not, in and of itself, demonstrate bad faith. The court of appeals was persuaded by the motion and granted it. Though we reversed the dismissal, we agree that a colorable issue was presented for consideration on the merits as to whether appellant’s intervening retirement would affect his entitlement to back pay.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant an award of attorney fees.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 43 cases

View all citing references →
1983: 11987: 21988: 41989: 11990: 11991: 21992: 31993: 21994: 21995: 31997: 12000: 42001: 32002: 12003: 12005: 12006: 12007: 12012: 12014: 12015: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12020: 12023: 12026: 119832026peak 1988 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Sorin v. Bd. of Educ., 347 N.E.2d 527 (Ohio 1976) 214
State ex rel. Crockett v. Robinson, 423 N.E.2d 1099 (Ohio 1981) 87
State ex rel. Grosser v. Boy, 347 N.E.2d 539 (Ohio 1976) 36
Nadine Payne v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 309 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1962) 39

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list