TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ronald Ray Reid v. Mary Punches, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma

Reid v. Punches, 62 F.3d 1429 (10th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 15, 1995
Docket
No. 95-6221
Citations
62 F.3d 14291995 WL 4803131995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29446

Opinion

62 F.3d 1429

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Ronald Ray REID, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary PUNCHES, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6221. D.C. No. CIV-94-1996-R.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 15, 1995.

Before MOORE, BARRETT, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT 1

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

This is a pro se appeal by a state prisoner from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Our review leads to the conclusion the district court did not err. The certificate of probable cause is GRANTED to allow our consideration of the merits, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons cited in its order and judgment.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1996: 119962026peak 1996 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reid v. Oklahoma State of101 F.3d 628 (10th Cir. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Reid v. Oklahoma State of101 F.3d 628 (10th Cir. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list