Brown v. H. W. Boies Co.
E. O. Brown, A. W. Brown, W. E. Brown, B. R. Lewis and W. O. Finkbine, Partners as Rhinelander Kindling Co. v. The H. W. Boies Co.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Shepard delivered the opinion of the Court.
This appeal can not be considered. No errors have been assigned on the record, and the omission has been insisted upon by the appellee as a reason for our not considering the cause, as would be our duty if errors were assigned.
This court can not review judgments except for errors committed below, and assigned here. Reasons filed below for a new trial do not obviate the necessity of an assignment of errors.
For the argument, we refer to Lang v. Max, 50 Ill. App. 465 , and in addition to the cases there cited, we add: Griswold v. Hicks, 132 Ill. 492 ; Mansfield v. Allison, 16 Ill. App. 31 ; Bogue-Badenock Co. v. Boyden, 33 Ill. App. 252 ; Mallers v. Marine Bank Co. (No. 5558 this term). The appeal will be dismissed at appellants’ costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.