Oakland Hotel Co. v. Driscoll
Oakland Hotel Company v. Emma Driscoll
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard delivered the opinion of the Court.
There being no assignment of errors written upon or attached to the record filed in this cause, as required by the rule, and none appearing anywhere except in the abstract, 'there is nothing for this court to act upon. We refer to Lang v. Max, 50 Ill. App. 465 , where many authorities are cited. Later decisions are, Hruby v. Vokoun, 55 Ill. App. 457 , and Brown v. The H. W. Boies Co., 58 Ill. App. 274 .
We may add that the point is urged in appellee’s brief, filed as long ago as November 2, 1896, and that no motion for leave to remedy the defect has been made, as might hai7e been done.
Instead, however, of dismissing the appeal, as was done in many of the cases referred to, we will follow a later authority of the Supreme Court, and affirm the judgment. Lancaster v. W. & S. Ry. Co., 132 Ill 492.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.