State v. Uptgraft
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Jordan, C. J.
Appellees were charged by indictment with having committed the crime of perjury. Upon their motion, the court quashed the indictment over the exceptions of the State, and granted the latter sixty days in which to file a bill of exceptions.
No final judgment whatever appears to have been rendered and entered in the case, and the State seems to have appealed from the ruling of the court in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment.
The rule is well .affirmed that an appeal to this court, in a criminal cause, whether prosecuted by the State or defendant, must be taken from a final judgment; otherwise, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Erganbright v. State, 148 Ind. 180 , and cases there cited. No final judgment having been rendered in this cause, the appeal is therefore dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.