Ingram v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Somerville, J.
As to the organization of the grand jury, the questions presented were decided adversely to the appellant in Patterson v. The State, 171 Ala. 2 ; 54 South. 696 . The predicate for the admission of dying declarations was sufficient. — McEwen v. The State, 152 Ala. 38 ; 44 South. 619 . Affirmed.
Dowdell, C. J., Anderson find Sayre, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.