TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge

Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge, 101 N.W. 61 (Mich. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 26, 1904
Docket
No. Calendar No. 20,743
Citations
101 N.W. 61138 Mich. 811904 Mich. LEXIS 792
Headnotes
1. Discontinuance—Stipulation—Setting Aside—Mandamus. An order striking a stipulation to discontinue without costs from the files, on the ground that it was obtained by deception, unless within 30 days plaintiff pays the costs therein or discontinues a subsequent suit for the same cause of action, does not involve the question whether the settlement of the cause of action was fraudulent, but merely requires plaintiff to proceed with his cause or pay the costs, and mandamus will not be granted to vacate it. 2. Same—Fraud. The circuit court on motion and proper showing may set aside a discontinuance fraudulently obtained.
Summary
Mandamus by Martha J. Thompson to compel Theodore F. Shepard, circuit judge of Bay county, to set aside an order striking a stipulation of discontinuance from the files. Petitioner brought suit in the circuit court of Bay county against the city of West Bay City for negligent personal injury, and had judgment, which was reversed on error in this court. Thompson v. City of West Bay City, 137 Mich. 94. The attorneys of the parties afterward stipulated to discontinue the cause without costs to either party, and petitioner subsequently brought another suit for the same injury against the city and another. Thereupon the city obtained an order striking the stipulation of discontinuance from the files unless petitioner should pay the accrued costs within 30 days or discontinue the second suit as to the city, on the grounds that the stipulation was obtained by deception, and that the understanding of the city’s attorney was that it was made for the purpose of terminating the litigation. Petitioner applies for mandamus to compel the circuit judge to set aside the order striking off the discontinuance, on the ground that the question of fraud presented could not be tried on motion and affidavits.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The writ will be denied. The case is distinguishable from Voigt Brewery Co. v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 103 Mich. 190 . In that case the effect of. the action of the circuit judge was to adjudge that a settlement of a cause of action was fraudulent. It was held that such question could not be thus tried. Here there is no such question. The plaintiff is merely required to proceed with her cause or pay the costs. If the discontinuance in such a case was obtained fraudulently, we think the court might set the same aside on motion and proper showing.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1932: 11937: 11947: 119322026peak 1932 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.193 A. 204 (Conn. 1937)
  2. Apple v. Ganson76 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947)
  3. Johnson v. Harvester Mutual Fire Insurance243 N.W. 242 (Mich. 1932)

Most recent

  1. Apple v. Ganson76 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947)
  2. Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.193 A. 204 (Conn. 1937)
  3. Johnson v. Harvester Mutual Fire Insurance243 N.W. 242 (Mich. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Voigt Brewery Co. v. Donovan, 61 N.W. 343 (Mich. 1894) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list