TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vorlander v. Hokenson

CHRISTIAN VORLANDER AND OTHERS v. A. J. HOKENSON AND ANOTHER. A. J. HOKENSON

Vorlander v. Hokenson, 175 N.W. 995 (Minn. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 23, 1920
Docket
No. 21,625
Judges
Cubiam
Citations
175 N.W. 995145 Minn. 484
Disposition
Reversed.
Cited by 3
Headnotes
Case followed.
Summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county for judgment directing defendant James G. Houghton, as inspector of buildings, to cancel a pretended permit, issued to defendant Hokenson, to construct a certain three-story brick apartment building and for a temporary injunction restraining Hokenson and others acting under him from erecting the building. Prom an order, Bardwell, J., granting a temporary injunction and from the writ of injunction, defendant Hokenson appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cubiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Cubiam.

The facts bring this case within the rule stated and applied in State v. Houghton, 134 Minn. 226 , 158 N. W. 1017 , and State v. City of Minneapolis, 136 Minn. 479 , 162 N. W. 477 . No distinction in point of substance can be *485 made between the facts there presented and those here before the court, and the decisions there rendered are followed and applied.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1925: 11926: 219252026peak 1926 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton204 N.W. 569 (Minn. 1925)
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.272 U.S. 365 (1926)
  3. Junge's Appeal. (No. 2.)89 Pa. Super. 548 (1926)

Most recent

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.272 U.S. 365 (1926)
  2. Junge's Appeal. (No. 2.)89 Pa. Super. 548 (1926)
  3. State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton204 N.W. 569 (Minn. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Lachtman v. Houghton, 158 N.W. 1017 (Minn. 1916) 35
State ex rel. Roerig v. City of Minneapolis, 162 N.W. 477 (Minn. 1917) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list